Skip to content

Research Report  |  Canadian Minor Hockey

The Oversight Gap
Minor Hockey Safety When Systems Don't Support You

A survey of 17 minor hockey leaders across Canada shows what happens when injury protocols meet a volunteer-run world.


17

Minor Hockey Leaders Surveyed

Free

No Sign-Up Required

12 min

Read Time

2026

Primary Research

12-2
88
%
Rate their safety as "Good"
59
%
Rate compliance tracking as "Good"
47
%
Say communication needs improvement

WHAT'S INSIDE

Four sections. One clear picture.

This report does not offer theory. It draws directly from what MHA leaders told us about how injury tracking, concussion management, and return-to-play compliance actually work across their associations.
Section I

The State of Play

How self-assessment ratings compare to what leaders describe on the ground.

Section II

The Visibility Gap

Why "good" systems produce incomplete records. Data from the survey, in plain language.

 

Section III

Three Pillars

The patterns that separate associations with reliable safety from those that struggle.

Section IV

The Infrastructure Fix

What high-performing associations do differently and how to start where you are.

 

"We find out later on many occasions injuries are not reported."

Minor Hockey Survey Respondent

KEY FINDINGS

What the data shows.

MHA leaders are not failing. They are operating without the tools to confirm whether their protocols are actually followed.

88%

Rate overall safety as "good"

But their own open-ended answers reveal protocols that break down when volunteers are the only line of enforcement.

65%

Believe volunteers are sufficiently trained

Their descriptions of real game-day situations tell a different story especially at the grassroots level.

59%

Rate compliance tracking as "good"

Yet most cannot run a report confirming which teams reported on injuries or followed return-to-play protocol.

70%

Rate protocol adherence as "good"

But without a centralized tracking system, adherence is an assumption not a verifiable outcome.


FRAMEWORK

Three pillars separate the best associations from the rest.

The gap is not effort. It is infrastructure. Here is what high-performing associations do differently.

01

Solve the Volunteer Burden Problem

Reduce reliance on memory by guiding volunteers through injury reporting step-by-step. When the system does the thinking, execution becomes consistent regardless of who is on the bench.


02

Scale Expertise Across Every Team

Your safety lead cannot be at every rink. A centralized platform gives them visibility across all teams so they can act on real-time information rather than end-of-week summaries.


03

Close the "Find Out Later" Gap

Shift from informal reporting email chains, paper forms, word of mouth to a system that creates a timestamped record for every incident across every team.



TAKE THE NEXT STEP

Know where your gaps are.

Take the 2-minute quiz to see how your association compares. Or download the practical guide to closing the visibility gap.